Joined Meta 2 months ago as an E4 in a completely different tech stack and domain. Recently my manager informed me in a 1:1 and subsequent email with my skip and ERBP that I’m trending BE. It has areas I’m missing the bar on and ways to improve so I’m planning to work on those but is there anything else I can do to turn this around and be successful? Is it impossible to get a CME for H1 if this signal has been documented?
Can you break down what those rating abbreviations mean? I haven't seen's those abbrevations used ever for Meta perf system & I don't think most people not familiar with Meta's perf system would be able to guess.
For mid year PSC, BE is below expectations and CME is consistently meets expectations
Thanks! If you're trending towards Below Expectations but have not gotten the rating, there is still time. The moment you are handed a PIP, you are effectively out of time.
The first step is talk to your manager around what behavior gaps they're observing: get in writing what are their expectations for behaviors for a mid-level engineer and what behaviors have they observed from you in past/current projects. Then work with them to figure out for the future projects you'll be given, what are the behaviors and artifacts they expect for Consisently Meets Expectations. Every week or two, sync with your manager on how you're trending and course adjust on their feedback.
For mid levels struggling it's usually a mix of:
If you'd like more tailored action items, feel free to share more specifics on what your manager is saying (either on here or just DM me on Slack).
Sorry to hear this - I didn't realize even this could happen 2 months in. I guess the "Year of Efficiency" Meta is not messing around, so I'm sadly not too surprised. The good news is that this is pre-PIP. You still have time to turn it around, and given the information you've given me, your manager is at least somewhat supportive (otherwise they wouldn't have done this).
On top of the plan they gave you (it looks like you got a pretty decent one if it has area breakdowns), I would try finding mentors among your team on top of your manager. Maybe there's a high-performing E4 or an E5 you can meet with once a week or biweekly.
When it comes to concrete action items, I highly recommend this very, very similar thread, also from a L4-level engineer: "Feedback that I'm underperforming for my level. Is this PIP? What now?"
Lastly, we actually just released a course on PIP. Check it out here: The Ultimate Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) Guide
Also, if you're willing to share some metrics, I can give more specific feedback. Over the past 2 months, what are these numbers for you (just share rough ranges)?
If you haven't used Team Insights yet, now's the time to discover it. There's more to engineering performance than metrics of course, but Meta is notoriously metrics-driven, and managers look at these numbers in calibration.
For an E4 in their 1st half, I am largely just expecting them to be a rock-solid code contributor. I mentored a ton of E4s and helped determine their ratings, so these numbers should be illuminating.
Hard to say if you can improve the rating from Below Expectations (BE) to Consistently Meets Expectations (CME) by the end of the half, but I don't think it's worth worrying much about that.
Even if you get BE, if your trajectory is positive and you show progress, you wouldn't get placed on a PIP. So your goal is to show improvement over the next 4 months.
Given the areas where you're missing the bar, propose a project and chat with your manager about their feedback on your ideas.